GARY FAIGIN
  • ARTIST
    • Meet the Artist
    • PAINTINGS >
      • TRAINS & TOWERS >
        • FINISHED PAINTINGS
        • SKETCH PAINTINGS
        • DRAWINGS ON PAPER
      • STILL LIFES - 1990 TO 2001
      • CITY OF BILLBOARDS
      • SHELTER
      • COMPRESSION FITTINGS
      • CONCENTRATED
      • MOVING PICTURES
      • IMAGINARY LANDSCAPES
      • PLEIN-AIR LANDSCAPES
      • FIGURES + PORTRAITS
    • DRAWINGS >
      • STILL LIFES
      • SELF PORTRAITS
      • FIGURES + PORTRAITS
    • MURAL OF CYCLES
    • CURRICULUM VITAE
    • PRESS + PUBLICATIONS
  • AUTHOR
    • Meet the Author
    • READER REVIEWS
    • BUY THE BOOK
  • EDUCATOR
    • Meet the Educator
    • GAGE ACADEMY >
      • ART TOURS
      • STILL LIFE ATELIER
      • ART WORKSHOPS
      • EVENING LECTURES
    • CG ARTISTS
  • SPEAKER
    • Meet the Speaker
  • CRITIC
    • MEET THE CRITIC
    • ARTIST INDEX
    • ART REVIEWS BLOG
  • CONTACT
  • ARTIST
    • Meet the Artist
    • PAINTINGS >
      • TRAINS & TOWERS >
        • FINISHED PAINTINGS
        • SKETCH PAINTINGS
        • DRAWINGS ON PAPER
      • STILL LIFES - 1990 TO 2001
      • CITY OF BILLBOARDS
      • SHELTER
      • COMPRESSION FITTINGS
      • CONCENTRATED
      • MOVING PICTURES
      • IMAGINARY LANDSCAPES
      • PLEIN-AIR LANDSCAPES
      • FIGURES + PORTRAITS
    • DRAWINGS >
      • STILL LIFES
      • SELF PORTRAITS
      • FIGURES + PORTRAITS
    • MURAL OF CYCLES
    • CURRICULUM VITAE
    • PRESS + PUBLICATIONS
  • AUTHOR
    • Meet the Author
    • READER REVIEWS
    • BUY THE BOOK
  • EDUCATOR
    • Meet the Educator
    • GAGE ACADEMY >
      • ART TOURS
      • STILL LIFE ATELIER
      • ART WORKSHOPS
      • EVENING LECTURES
    • CG ARTISTS
  • SPEAKER
    • Meet the Speaker
  • CRITIC
    • MEET THE CRITIC
    • ARTIST INDEX
    • ART REVIEWS BLOG
  • CONTACT

Linda Davidson at Catherine Person Gallery - December 2008

12/1/2008

0 Comments

 
Picture
Few subjects seem more innocuous than forests and flowers, but context can change everything.  In her latest exhibition, Seattle painter Linda Davidson juxtaposes pastoral images with depictions of scenes that are far more ominous, and the effect is purposely unsettling.  KUOW art critic, Gary Faigin, joins us now to share his observations on this provocative show.

Landscape painter Linda Davidson thinks sequentially.  Her current show of 18 three-foot square paintings is mounted as a narrative, rather like a graphic novel or a filmstrip. Though the paintings are also intended to stand alone (which they do quite handsomely, in most cases), the relationships between the images is clearly something to which the artist attaches great importance, and it decisively shapes the way we experience her pictures.
Davidson has frequently pushed the envelope of what we expect to see in a painting exhibition.  Several recent shows featured tiny paintings by the dozens, or even hundreds, creating meta-images as large as 40 feet across where each independent picture was also part of the larger whole.  Davidson has also produced giant, text-based drawings using thousands of typed words to build up a grainy image of a tree, or an explosion. 

The current show is more modest in scope, but the effect is still striking.  The show has a clear, very modern theme: the undercurrent of dread that accompanies our experience of nature – an awareness of calamities both natural (mortality) and man-made.  It is appropriate that the paintings that illustrate these ideas are skillful, straightforward, and economical, realism with an appealing painterly touch; documentary in intent, but stripped down in detail.

Each of the three gallery walls contains a self-contained grouping.  The most effective of these, and the most coherent, is on the south wall, a set of five images of skies and clouds.  Actually, only one of these paintings is just a picture of a cloudy sky, the one in the middle of the group.  The other, superficially similar paintings are of the unnatural billows created by fires and explosions, and by the time we’re done scanning the group, we’re not sure if the middle picture is quite as innocent as it appears, either.

Davidson handles her apocalyptic imagery with a sense of restraint – someone is creating these conflagrations, but we don’t have a hint as to who, why, or where.  The opening image, "Mindfield", is simplicity itself.  The viewer looks up a green hillside to a row of bushes and a lone tree, above which is a clear, cloudless sky.  Either we, or the landscape, seems to be in motion, as everything is blurred in horizontal streaks.  In sharp focus, however, is a tiny orange cloud rising from the other side of the hill, its hot radiance licking at the edge of the tree, gilding the lowest branches and trunk with an unnatural light.   It’s a strong painting because it’s so understated - a bomb blast in Paradise.  The blur goes with the cinematic conceit that runs throughout the show, here suggesting the jerky, handheld camera work that we know from the movies.

The other four paintings in the row share a similar palette, composition, and treatment, but they become progressively more fraught as the implied sequence unfolds.  "Controlled Detonation," just to the right of "Mindfield," reads like a close-up, with the sky suddenly turned grey, smoke rising from the foreground, and the tree leaning further over.  "Cedar" is peaceful, a lone tree silhouetted against a radiant cumulus sky, but Davidson has purposely used urgent, whirling paint strokes to describe the white light in the middle of the cloud, and here the pastoral takes on a sinister possibility that would disappear were the painting seen on its own – an anxious sky, indeed.

 "Vamoose,"  my favorite painting in the show (the title refers to two darting birds in the foreground), seems to take place a bit further on in time, when blast has been replaced by fire.  The viewpoint is much further away, and the landscape has changed.  We’re now looking at a rutted, tawny field like the moors of Scotland, with a beautifully painted grey smoke plume rising ominously in the distance, its source hidden from our view by the knife-like edge of a green-grey ridge.  Is it a battle in progress, a plane crash, terrorism, or simply field burning?  By avoiding specifics, Davidson keeps us off balance; something is happening here, but we don’t know what it is… just like the man said.

The last painting in the group is like the scene in the movie where the monster lurches into full view  - we finally get a close-up of the source of the calamity.  "Kaboom" - titles are not the artist’s strong point -depicts a giant fireball against the blue sky from "Mindfield," but the painting itself is a bit of a letdown ,as the movie monster so often is.  Here Davidson’s sketchy, high-key treatment seems a mismatch for the subject matter, and neither the fireball nor the accompanying smoke has any weight.  Part of the horror of an explosion is how dense and solid it is, not just a froth of gas, but a thing with a sculptural presence, planes and dimensions, a substance unlike any other.

The other two walls of the gallery contain similarly interesting groups, but without the satisfying narrative arc of the "Mindfield" wall.  Two paintings of leafless forests flank an explosion, their titles tying them into actual events – a Nazi massacre, an atomic test, a forest fire.  The last group is the most mixed up, ten paintings displaying both a wide variety of painting styles and subject matter.  The images range from floral close-ups to rainbows, with one painting nearly abstract but suggestive of sky and clouds, and two views of a old farmhouse, one blurry, one black and white like an old photo.    I found the variety of painting styles a bit bewildering (there are at least 5), and somewhat beside the point.  The images don’t make a convincing group , and probably aren’t meant to.  But there are terrific moments, including a vividly imagined fire plume about to blot out a pastoral sky, and indoor flowers whose backlit structure is spookily suggestive of human blood vessels in form and color.

The fact that both images are beautiful points out the contradiction at the heart of Davidson’s exhibition, one that she repeatedly makes clear.  We know that the unspoiled world gives us aesthetic pleasure, as do those parts of nature that suggest fecundity and growth.  What Davidson points out here by her judicious pairings is that destruction can be beautiful too, even as it undoes the work of creation.  It’s a scary, but fascinating thought, one that certainly occurred to the ancient Greeks, whose hottest couple was none other than Venus and Mars, beauty and mayhem inseparably linked, the one drawing on the energy of the other.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    FAIGIN ART REVIEWS
    ​​A collection of reviews, featuring mostly NW artists, galleries and museums, on KUOW Radio from 2000 to 2012, in the Seattle Times from 2014 to present, and in other publications, as noted, beginning in 1993.

    ​SUBSCRIBE: To receive  an email notice of new Art Review Blog postings, please use the Contact Form.

    RSS Feed

    ARCHIVES

    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    August 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    July 2005
    June 2005
    April 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004
    October 2004
    September 2004
    August 2004
    July 2004
    June 2004
    May 2004
    April 2004
    March 2004
    February 2004
    January 2004
    December 2003
    November 2003
    October 2003
    September 2003
    July 2003
    May 2003
    April 2003
    March 2003
    February 2003
    January 2003
    December 2002
    October 2002
    September 2002
    August 2002
    July 2002
    June 2002
    May 2002
    April 2002
    March 2002
    February 2002
    January 2002
    December 2001
    November 2001
    October 2001
    September 2001
    August 2001
    July 2001
    June 2001
    May 2001
    April 2001
    March 2001
    February 2001
    January 2001
    December 2000
    November 2000
    October 2000
    December 1993

Proudly powered by Weebly